Future of Electric
Power
Well if the
lesson of Fukishima and nuclear power isn’t obvious, it should be. I doubt if
anyone had in mind the size of a tsunami as that which hit Japan, and forever
changed nuclear power as a primary source of providing electricity. We know
that coal is harmful to the environment and that it increases the likelihood of
warming the earth. Gas and oil are just Band-Aids as they too have contributed
to global warming as well as the use of internal combustion engines. It seems
as if solar and wind power is the two best tools we have in our tool bag to
produce electricity efficiently and in a green manor that is least harmful to
the environment.
Water power is
also a manor of producing electricity, and is also a green means of generating
electricity but in that case it seems as if we block a river valley, we cause
harmful problems associated with migratory habits of animals and fishes in
particular. We forever change their habits as they try to adapt to new changes
in their environment if they can. It is also an expensive venture in the
initial cost as well as the continuing maintenance of said structures into the
future.
Water power can be
a means to an end though if designed properly. Throughout the country we have
hills and mountains where we could impound water from excess electricity that
is generated from our existing power plants. We produce way to much at times
and a lot of it is lost in heat generation as the electricity pulses over long
distances in the lines that service us. Whatever we don’t use is eventually
lost to the environment as we have no real means of storing excess electricity.
Also current practices of generating electricity have us generating in one
location and using it over a 100 or miles away from the original source of
producing the electricity. And this may be so even if closer sources of
generation are available. That means if Con Ed has a nuclear plant up the road
and American Electric Power is in charge of the grid next to it. Then only in
emergencies of low line voltage will one sell to the other to avoid a black
out.
But if we took
all the excess electricity that was generated out of our power plants at full
operating capacity where they are most efficient, and used this to pump water
to higher locations geographically speaking. Then when we need more electricity
we could always flow it back to a lower level and in the process regenerate the
surplus electricity. This is one means by which we can store electricity.
Storing electricity has never been a
priority before but is something that needs to be done. This idea of using
stored water to save electricity was proposed for our area before. In fact it
was in Norton, Ohio where Morton salt company has extensive underground caverns
this was proposed before. There they were going to use the underground caverns
and a vertical drop of almost 600 feet to generate more than enough power to
efficiently operate a hydroelectric plant underground, using the pool of water
above to fill the electrical needs of the grid
as opposed to generating more electricity from other means like coal.
For some reason the project was scrapped or is being done secretly as I have
never heard any more about it. There are hill tops in Ohio where we could
have similar vertical drops and achieve the same thing.
This would allow
us to use our generating facilities more efficiently running them for shorter
periods of time and it would also allow us to upload excess electricity from
solar generation and wind power whenever we wanted to and not just when the electric
company needs it. Virtually every electric meter on the grid would then become
a meter where you could upload electricity to, any time regardless of who was
generating the power. If we reached a critical mass where we are producing more
electric than we need, we simply pump water uphill at a variety of locations. This
would require a pool of water at both locations at the top of the hill and the
bottom and generating facilities. Some water will be lost to evaporation, but
this all depends on how soon the pool is being used. The possibility of
coupling it with solar where the cells would generate electricity during the
day and pump the water uphill then at night when the sun isn’t shining you
could reverse the flow when you need electric most.
As much as I like
the free enterprise system I think it is time to take electric generation out
of the hands of private enterprise as there is little incentive to be frugal
with these resources as we have become more dependent on electricity all the
time. We are letting the major power companies become monopolies and the money
is being spent lobbying the use of coal and other sources of greenhouse warming
sources of fuel, and then passing these costs on to the consumer. Whenever they
want a rate hike it seems it is just a matter of time before they get it, and
eventually we all pay for it.
There is no
incentive to use naturally occurring sources of electricity as they know the
eventual end of what it all means. It is up to the individual consumer to ease
that burden by reducing your need for electricity. If possible, be able to
generate your own electricity and use it first. We use only an eighth of all
sunlight energy that hits the earth daily for power generation. Once solar is
in place it tends to pay back far greater returns than what it costs for
investment. Turning that meter around should be priority for us all.
Coupled with
other forms of energy I can see hybrid rovers eventually panning our landscape
for better wind and sun positioning in remote areas where power generation
never would have been thought of before. An operator comfortably nestled in his
house could send robotic energy gatherers out and collect energy in the form of
electricity from solar or wind depending on whether one or the other was the
prominent generating source and when full of stored electricity would dock
itself at an upload station and download all the power stored in its batteries then
go out and gather more working incessantly 24 hours a day 7 days a week without
much human intervention except maintenance primarily. This could be done to
pump water uphill as I previously described and then download the power
generated to the grid when the pool of water is full.
We have the technology
now to accomplish this task presently. There is very little difference between
this and the initial rovers put on Mars only we are here on Earth. This could
for the most part be all renewable sources of electricity.
And if we
look at renewable sources of green electricity we could help ourselves by
planting vast swaths of trees for the purpose of power generation alone using
their mass to fuel the boilers like we did years ago in the early stages of the
industrial revolution. Planting trees
that will be consumed 20 years down the road is just the same as passively
storing solar energy as the trees do so well what we can only attempt to do. There
is no reason we couldn’t get into a system where trees would provide our needs
in fuel. At the same time we lock up carbon dioxide that is causing our global
warming and achieve two goals at once. This would also provide us with a
utilization of waste materials that normally end up in landfills.
At one time
during World War 2 our country proposed a means of capturing the gasses off of
wood through the use of degasification and the resulting product was fuel for
our vehicles and for power generation without the harmful effects of burning
wood openly. This is done through a wood gas generator and the plans are still
available on the net. When times get tough, like when hurricane Katrina or
World War 2 was around and people knew they had little choice, then our
government would issue the bulletin describing how to build your own wood gas generator.
This was used extensively in Europe and here in the United States during World
War 2 and had a beneficial use of extending our resources then as much as we need
to now.
Coupled with
increased planting on marginal lands we could reverse the effect of greenhouse
gases in our atmosphere in less time and with less expense than it took to get
in this shape in the first place. We have shown that we can affect atmospheric
changes in a wrong way, and now it is time for us to reverse that trend in a positive
way, and think about leaving our children with a legacy of caring about our
environment instead of destroying it through profitability.
Sometimes as in the use of fossil fuels we
find their use easy and the costs fixed so that one knows with x amount of
investment I will get y return. Our environment cannot be limited to an algorithm
that we just plug numbers into and then spits an outcome. Sometimes we don’t see
the outcome till the polar caps start to melt. Then even then the naysayers
will still say it isn’t a problem as they move to higher ground and reassess
the damage and convert it to a profit. We can’t let Wall Street tell us where
to go as they no doubt will be on the next spaceship to planet b as soon as
they can buy a ticket leaving the rest of us poor souls behind.
So I guess in
conclusion if you have made it this far you are taking the first step to
achieving awareness of a problem of our generation and the ones before and informing
yourself about where we should go in terms of direction humans should take when
it comes to or creature comforts and how we should provide the power for them
to operate without harm to the environment. Profit can be made and money can be
spent wisely instead of kicking the can down the road. We can’t keep going on
like we are without some kind of repercussion. Massive storms and loss of life
are on the horizon as our planet heats up. Last night should be an example. As
well the typhoon in the Philippines is also an example of how the excess energy
in our environment is changing our weather and lifestyles. Where does it end or
are we looking at the beginning of the end? Informing yourself to viable
alternatives is the first step. Electing representatives who also believe in the
same thing is the next step. Turning off that bathroom light will all help when
it we pass this issue and others down to our children.
http://www.allpowerlabs.org/gasification/resources/papers/Handbook.Reed.Das.pdf
http://www.woodgas.net/files/FEMA_emergency_gassifer.pdf
http://www.allpowerlabs.org/gasification/resources/papers/Handbook.Reed.Das.pdf
http://www.woodgas.net/files/FEMA_emergency_gassifer.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment